[Rezension:] Geschichte des antiken Kommunismus und
Socialismus. By ROBERT PÖHLMANN. I. Band., in: Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 5 (Jan., 1895), S. 146-148.
Geschichte des antiken Kommunismus und Socialismus. By ROBERT
PÖHLMANN.
I. Band. München: Beck, 1893.
I. Band. München: Beck, 1893.
146
The title of this bookNota edytorska: Elektroniczna wersja książki Pöhlmanna znajduje się w serwisie
GoogleBooks pod adresem:
http://books.google.com/books?id=MrpAAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Robert+von+Pöhlmann%22&ei=kQv2SuGAL5mkM4-nsaQF&hl=de#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Anmerkung des Editors: Elektonische Version Pöhlmanns Buches kann in
GoogleBücher angesehen werden. Link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=MrpAAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Robert+von+Pöhlmann%22&ei=kQv2SuGAL5mkM4-nsaQF&hl=de#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Editors Note: The electronic version of Pöhlmanns’s publication can be viewed
online on GoogleBooks under the adress:
http://books.google.com/books?id=MrpAAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Robert+von+Pöhlmann%22&ei=kQv2SuGAL5mkM4-nsaQF&hl=de#v=onepage&q=&f=false
does not correspond strictly to the contents, which offer more than that
would indicate. We have to do here not simply with an historical, but also with a
politico-social work, in which the historical foundation serves merely as the
occasion for developing the author’s philosophical and politico-social views. The
author does this by continually bringing the socialistic and communistic
theories of antiquity and modern times into juxtaposition, and comparing them.
The first chapter, in which he criticises the theories and
traditions of the original communism of the older Greek States, is very interesting.
All the information from the old writers, as well as the opinions of modern
investigators, relative thereto, are made to pass in review before him; and he
arrives at the conclusion that the supposed primitive communism in no case proves
itself to be historically worthy of credence. In fact, the hypotheses of primitive
communism are „phenomena of the human mind, which are accustomed to manifest
themselves spontaneously as the logical consequence of certain human experiences,
stimulating to the formation of new ideas. In all times
147
of agitation,
in which the existing social and political order no longer meets legitimate needs
and desires, and therefore begins to go to pieces, we are met by this reaching out
from the disintegration going on in the life of the present, into the world of the
ideal.“ In this respect, however, the fourth century before Christ in Greece was
very similar to the present age. Then, as now, communistic and socialistic theories
sprang up as the result of the excessive development of the capitalistic
organization of society; and then as now there was a tendency, in order to claim for
these an historic authority, to set up hypotheses, according to which under
primitive conditions communism and socialism were declared to be the rule. Sober and
objective investigation, however, does not confirm these hypotheses.
In the second chapter the author takes up the
individualistic disintegration of society and the reaction against this
disintegration in political and social philosophic theory. In Greece during the
fourth and third centuries the unfortunate opposition between capitalism and
pauperism appeared in the shape of unrestrained exploitation and grasping
speculation, and the bitterness and mutual restraint of the different social classes
which came of envy and hate. While these evils were being defended in the
individualistic philosophy, there arose an idealistic social philosophy whose
purpose was to introduce a better social order.
In the third and fourth chapters, the last of this volume,
the author next lays before us „plans of organization for the construction of a new
system of State and society.“ He particularly discusses the chief works of
Plato, his „Republic“ and „Laws.“ Although there already exists a whole
literature on the subject of these two works of Plato, the author succeeds in
putting them before us in a new light. In the first place, he views them in their
connection with the existing economic conditions of Plato’s time, to which they
stand as a contrasted picture; and in the second place, he puts the demands of
Plato’s time parallel with the socialistic and communistic demands of our
time. This juxtaposition is particularly instructive, for it shows us how
socialistic and communistic theories and agitations are nothing more than a kind of
social and psycho-social reflex-action which is produced in all times and places by
the excessive abuses of capitalism.
His contrast of the two works of
Plato is also
interesting. One of them, the „Republic,“ points to the impetuous progressiveness of
Plato’s spirit, when the still immatured philosopher failed to take into
account the social necessities which control the life of men; while in his „Laws“ he
is careful to regard these necessities. It is the eternal contrast of youthful
impetuosity with the maturer judgment of more advanced years which manifests itself
in these two works.
148
In conclusion, the author discusses briefly
the „social universal state of Zeno, the founder of stoicism,“ in which „the utopian
element in socialism, its irrepressible tendency to lose itself in boundless
perspectives, has found the purest expression imaginable.“
It is with great interest that the scholarly world will
look forward to the continuation of this historical and politico-social work.
LUDWIG GUMPLOWICZ.
[Translated by Ellen C. Semple.]